The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MARK S. THOMPSON, JAMES T. BEALS, PHILIP H. MCCLUSKEY, DAVID W. MCKEE, MICHAEL C. LANG, FRED J. LUSSIER, JOSEPH A.L. LEDOUX, DAT T. NGUYEN and PAUL BENNETT _____________ Appeal No. 2000-1737 Application No. 08/965,180 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before CALVERT, PATE, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges. PATE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and 4 through 7. Claims 2, 3, and 8-11 are subject to a restriction requirement and have been withdrawn from consideration. These are all the claims in the application. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007