Ex parte THOMPSON et al. - Page 3




            Appeal No. 2000-1737                                                                         
            Application No. 08/965,180                                                                   


                                           THE REJECTIONS                                                
                  Claims 1 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                              
            unpatentable over the British patent Okada '451 in view of The                               
            Science and Technology article and Marin.  According to the                                  
            examiner, Okada discloses an elevator safety brake having a                                  
            molybdenum alloy friction surface.  Okada does not disclose                                  
            the specific alloy formed of 99.4 percent molybdenum, 0.5                                    
            weight percent titanium, and 0.1 weight percent zirconium.                                   
            The examiner further states that The Science and Technology                                  
            article discloses an alloy formed of molybdenum plus 0.5                                     
            weight percent titanium and .07 weight percent zirconium.  The                               
            examiner notes that the .07 weight percent zirconium would                                   
            round off to the 0.1 percent zirconium claimed.  Finally, the                                
            examiner states that Marin is relied upon to show known                                      
            examples of molybdenum, titanium, and zirconium used as                                      
            friction materials.  Furthermore, the examiner takes official                                
            notice that molybdenum, titanium, and zirconium have known                                   
            frictional properties.                                                                       
                  Based on these findings, it is the examiner's conclusion                               
            that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in                                  
            the art at the time the invention was made to have constructed                               
                                                   3                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007