Ex parte YOUNGER - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 2000-1743                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 09/314,618                                                                                                             


                 Appellant's invention relates to a method for modifying                                                                                
                 hydraulic circuitry of an automotive transmission                                                                                      
                 (specifically a Hydramatic 4L80E General Motors transmission)                                                                          
                 so as to enable a user to select first gear at any time,                                                                               
                 thereby enabling the driver to obtain a "first" gear ratio                                                                             
                 whenever the gear selector lever is placed in the "1" position                                                                         
                 without regard to the actual vehicle speed or engine                                                                                   
                 rotational speed.  Independent claim 1 is representative of                                                                            
                 the subject matter on appeal and a copy of that claim can be                                                                           
                 found in the Appendix to appellant's brief.                                                                                            


                 The sole prior art reference relied upon by the examiner                                                                               
                 in rejecting the appealed claims is:                                                                                                   
                 Bouda                                                 4,858,498                                    Aug.                                
                 22, 1989                                                                                                                               


                 Claims 1 through 6 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                                
                 § 102(b) as being anticipated by Bouda.1                                                                                               

                          1In the advisory action mailed September 3, 1999 (Paper                                                                       
                 No. 6), the examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claim 7                                                                            
                 under                                                                                                                                  
                 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Bouda and also the rejection of                                                                            
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007