Appeal No. 2000-1841 Application 09/016,738 Inasmuch as Garman affords no cure of the shortcomings in the basic Shook-Brown combination, we also shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 2, 3, 5 through 7, 11 and 12 as being unpatentable over Shook in view of Brown and Garman. SUMMARY The decision of the examiner is affirmed with respect to the 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, rejection of claim 14, and reversed with respect to the 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejections of claims 1 through 17. AFFIRMED-IN-PART WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) ) APPEALS AND LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) ) JOHN P. MCQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007