Ex parte DENNY - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2000-1971                                                        
          Application No. 09/002,537                                                  


               Floe pertains to a trailer and tongue structure                        
          comprising a tongue 42 of extruded aluminum (col. 5, lines 27-              
          39) having a cross section as shown in Figure 2.  Floe                      
          describes the cross section shape of the tongue as follows:                 


               Tongue 42 has an upper generally rectangular portion                   
               with a support surface 70 that is about 3.0 inches                     
               in width, and a lower approximately oval portion,                      
               separated by walls 72 and 74 to form channels 50 and                   
               51.  The lower oval shaped portion and the                             
               longitudinal ridges are designed to provide                            
               strength.  [Col. 5, lines 45-50.]                                      
               An objective of Floe’s invention is the provision of an                
          improved trailer tongue “that allows cooperation with a                     
          vehicle-mounted hitch assembly to maximize the permissible                  
          angle between the tongue and the hitch assembly” (col. 2,                   
          lines 47-50).  To this end,                                                 
               {t]he tongue structure [42] has a predetermined                        
               cross-sectional shape with opposed longitudinally                      
               extending channels [50, 51] arranged to cooperate                      
               with the support structure [120 in Figure 9] of the                    
               vehicle-mounted hitch to minimize unwanted contact                     
               between the tongue and the support structure to                        
               avoid damage to the tongue or the hitch.  [Col. 3,                     
               lines 26-33.]                                                          
          See also col. 6, lines 54-68 and Figure 9 for a further                     
          explanation of how channels 50, 51 achieve this objective.                  

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007