The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DANIEL M. EGGERT et al. ____________ Appeal No. 2000-2097 Application No. 08/852,681 ____________ HEARD: January 18, 2001 ____________ Before CALVERT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 3, 5, 26, 28 and 29. Claims 8 to 10, 12 to 14 and 16 have been allowed. Claims 4, 6, 7, 11, 15, 17 to 25 and 27 have been canceled. We REVERSE and enter new rejections pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007