Appeal No. 2000-2097 Page 5 Application No. 08/852,681 teachings of the prior art to produce the claimed invention, absent some teaching or suggestion supporting the combination." ACS Hosp. Sys., Inc. v. Montefiore Hosp., 732 F.2d 1572, 1577, 221 USPQ 929, 933 (Fed. Cir. 1984). And "teachings of references can be combined only if there is some suggestion or incentive to do so." Id. Claim 1, the sole independent claim on appeal, reads as follows: A wrench comprising: a handle formed entirely of non-metallic material; and a head at an end of the handle, said head including a non-metallic body, a metal workpiece-engaging member encompassed by said body so as to secure said member to said body, and a reinforcing structure embedded in said body and encompassing said workpiece-engaging member. In this case, after reviewing the teachings of the applied prior art, we find ourselves in agreement with the appellants' position (brief, pp. 5-8) that there is nothing in either Zurbuchen '300 or Cooper which would have suggested either (1) making the workpiece-engaging member of Zurbuchen '300 of metal, or (2) providing Zurbuchen '300 with aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007