Ex parte MARTIN - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2001-0025                                                        
          Application No. 08/751,980                                                  


                    a plurality of pins connecting the friction                       
                              rings together, said                                    
                              friction rings being                                    
                              connected together only                                 
                              by said plurality of                                    
                              pins,                                                   
                    said pins each having a thickened center                          
                    part serving to space the friction rings                          
                    from one another and respective end parts                         
                    secured in respective bores in the friction                       
                    rings by a heating process.                                       


               It is worthy of noting at this point that in our                       
          obviousness evaluation of the content of claim 9, relative to               
          the collective teachings of JP ‘237 and Goodyear, we have                   
          weighed declarant Martin’s stated perceptions of the applied                
          prior art as set forth in the declaration (paragraphs 8                     
          through 12).                                                                


               In applying the test for obviousness,4 we reach the                    
          conclusion it would have been obvious to one having ordinary                


               4 The test for obviousness is what the combined teachings              
          of references would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in              
          the art. See In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 591, 18 USPQ2d 1089,                
          1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991) and In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425, 208              
          USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981).                                                  

                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007