Appeal No. 2001-0025 Application No. 08/751,980 a plurality of pins connecting the friction rings together, said friction rings being connected together only by said plurality of pins, said pins each having a thickened center part serving to space the friction rings from one another and respective end parts secured in respective bores in the friction rings by a heating process. It is worthy of noting at this point that in our obviousness evaluation of the content of claim 9, relative to the collective teachings of JP ‘237 and Goodyear, we have weighed declarant Martin’s stated perceptions of the applied prior art as set forth in the declaration (paragraphs 8 through 12). In applying the test for obviousness,4 we reach the conclusion it would have been obvious to one having ordinary 4 The test for obviousness is what the combined teachings of references would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 591, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991) and In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981). 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007