The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSE H. CHAVEZ JR, GARY M. COMSTOCK, ARVIND PATEL,
TIMOTHY E. PURKIS and YEW TECK YAP
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0141
Application No. 09/016,851
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge
COHEN and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 12 which are all the claims
pending in the application.
Appellants’ invention relates to a method of manufacturing
a terminal module. An understanding of the invention can be
derived from a reading of exemplary claim 7 which appears in the
appendix to the brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007