The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KIYOSHI TSUJI, AKINOBU UCHIKUBO, KENJI KIMURA,
MASAHITO GOTO and TSUTOMU HIRAI
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0321
Application No. 08/888,671
____________
HEARD: April 3, 2001
____________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Kiyoshi Tsuji et al. appeal from the final rejection
(Paper No. 35) of claims 64, 68, 70 and 71, all of the claims
pending in the application.1
THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an electronic endoscope system
which is defined in representative claim 64 as follows:
1Claim 68 has been amended subsequent to final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007