Appeal No. 2001-0436 Application No. 09/040,361 the word “under” may mean “beneath the surface of.” However, appellants’ transmission unit 10 as shown in Figure 1 is not vertically aligned with engine unit 1, but rather offset to the right of the engine unit. This being the case, it is not clear how the transmission unit 10 can be “under” (i.e., beneath) the engine unit 1 based on the above noted commonly accepted definition of “under.” While appellants may have intended the word “under” to have a specialized meaning within the context of the present invention, it is not clear what that specialized meaning might be. Accordingly, when the claim terminology “said engine assembly comprises an engine unit and a transmission unit which is disposed under said engine unit” is read in light of its supporting specification, we are left to speculate as to precisely what the word “under” appearing therein may mean. Another instance of claim terminology whose meaning is not clear is found in the last paragraph of claim 1, which calls for a transmission unit projecting rearward toward a passenger compartment of the vehicle body and forming a recess “between an upper portion of said engine unit and said transmission unit.” As shown in Figure 1, appellants’ transmission unit 10 is not in vertical alignment with engine unit 1, and in particular the intake manifold 8 thereof, but rather offset to the right of the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007