Appeal No. 2001-0528 Page 2
Application No. 08/892,348
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a modularized
structure framing system and module erection tools
(specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is
set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Wilson 1,448,244 Mar. 13,
1923
Kofahl et al. 2,803,856 Aug. 27,
1957
(Kofahl)
Pennecot 3,921,355 Nov. 25,
1975
Coulthard 4,118,903 Oct.
10, 1978
Schonert 4,281,491 Aug. 4,
1981
The rejections set forth in the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 15, mailed October 24, 2000) are as follows:
(1) Claims 21 to 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as being anticipated by Pennecot.
(2) Claims 21 to 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Schonert in view of Kofahl.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007