Appeal No. 2001-0534 Page 4
Application No. 09/271,626
obviousness is established by presenting evidence that would
have led one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the
relevant teachings of the references to arrive at the claimed
invention. See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1074, 5 USPQ2d
1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988) and In re Lintner, 458 F.2d 1013,
1016, 173 USPQ 560, 562 (CCPA 1972).
Claims 1 to 7
Claims 1 to 7 are drawn to a robotic fire protection
system comprising, inter alia, a robotic survey vehicle for
surveying an area which it is desired to protect from fire
damage; a robotic fire suppression vehicle for administering
fire suppressing agents upon command, which is
maintained/deployed at a strategic location within said area;
and a manned control and monitoring station for remote control
of said robotic survey vehicle and said robotic fire
suppression vehicle.
Foote's invention relates to a microwave-powered aircraft
and, more particularly, an unmanned, remotely controlled
aircraft to which microwave power is transmitted from a ground
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007