Appeal No. 2001-0534 Page 11
Application No. 09/271,626
these two steps were inherent is not supported by the
teachings of the applied prior art.
Since the subject matter of claim 8 is not suggested by
the applied prior art for the reasons set forth above, the
decision of the examiner to reject claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 1 to 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007