Appeal No. 2001-0690 Application No. 08/309,315 Claims 7, 12 and 22 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are reproduced below: 7. A process of increasing cell death comprising the steps of: (a) treating cells with a DNA damaging agent; and (b) contacting the cells with a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor. 12. A method for the treatment of neoplastic disease in a patient comprising the steps of: (a) administering to the patient a pharmaceutically acceptable preparation which includes a therapeutically effective amount of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor; and (b) treating neoplastic cells with a therapeutically effective amount of a DNA damaging agent. 22. A method of increasing the effect of ionizing radiation on cell killing, comprising the steps of: (a) treating the cells with a therapeutically effective amount of ionizing radiation; and (b) contacting the cells with a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The references relied upon by the examiner are: Margolis et al. (Margolis) 5,262,409 Nov. 16, 1993 Uckun et al. (Uckun), “Ionizing radiation stimulates unidentified tyrosine-specific protein kinases in human B-lymphocyte precursors, triggering apoptosis and clonogenic cell death,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 89, pp. 9005-9009 (1992) Akinaga et al. (Akinaga), “Enhancement of antitumor activity of mitomycin C in vitro and in vivo by UCN-01, a selective inhibitor of protein kinase C,” Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., Vol. 32, pp. 183-189 (1993) GROUNDS OF REJECTION Claims 7, 9 and 12-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Margolis in view of Akinaga. Claims 7, 9, 12-14 and 22-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Uckun. We reverse. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007