Ex parte DALL'ORO et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 2001-0707                                                                                     Page 2                        
                 Application No. 09/068,526                                                                                                             


                          The appellants' invention relates to a method for                                                                             
                 building a serpentine heat exchanger.  A substantially correct                                                                         
                 copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix                                                                           
                 to the appellants' brief.                    1                                                                                         


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Young                                        2,706,105                                             Apr. 12,                            
                 1955                                                                                                                                   
                 Thomas et al.                                2,908,070                                             Oct. 13,                            
                 1959                                                                                                                                   
                 (Thomas)                                                                                                                               
                 Beauvais                                     3,460,225                                             Aug. 12,                            
                 1969                                                                                                                                   



                          Claims 1 to 3 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                      
                 as being unpatentable over Young in view of Thomas and                                                                                 
                 Beauvais.                                                                                                                              






                          1In claim 1, line 8, "said wires extending (303)" should                                                                      
                 read --said wires (303) extending--; in claim 2, line 2,                                                                               
                 "bend" should be --bent--; and in claim 3, line 1, the phrase                                                                          
                 "or claim 2" should be deleted.                                                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007