Appeal No. 2001-0707 Page 8
Application No. 09/068,526
Since all the limitations of method claim 1 are not
taught or suggested by the applied prior art for the reasons
set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim
1, and claims 2, 3 and 8 dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. §
103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 1 to 3 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007