Appeal No. 2001,0712 Application 08/148,887 combine prior art references. In re Dembiczak, 175 F.3d 994, 1000-01, 50 USPQ2d 1614, 1617-19 (Fed. Cir. 1999). On pages 11-13 of the brief, Appellants argue that there is no suggestion in the prior art to combine the teachings of Hitchcock with the teachings of Chi. Specifically, Appellants point out that Hitchcock teaches a 5 method of automatically synthesizing data paths from a behavioral description of a hardware design. The EMUCS program implementing the method attempts to find a minimum cost implementation of a hardware design given a dataflow representation VT (Appellants' emphasis). The program proceeds by binding abstract data flow elements onto hardware elements in iterative fashion. Once all the hardware elements have been bound, the program determines which implementation would result in the optimum design given the parameter which is to be optimized. 6 7 Appellants assert that Chi teaches a graph-based 5Page 484, column 1. 6Brief, page 12. 7Page 286, column 1; page 270, columns 1-2 and table 2. 10Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007