Appeal No. 2001-0738 Application No. 08/953,606 frame or frame rails whatsoever. As to Wallace, while this reference does indeed disclose a frame comprising frame rails having a downwardly sloping intermediate section between a front section and a mid section, there is no teaching of a subframe having vertical attachment members, much less any teaching of vertically extending rear attachment members attached to the downwardly sloping intermediate sections of the frame rails. Concerning Mukai, the frame rails 13 thereof do not include a downwardly sloping intermediate section connecting a front section and a mid section. Rather, as can be seen in Figure 4, the frame rails 13 of Mukai are straight, at least in the area of concern at the location where the suspension cross member 17 is mounted. From our perspective, the only suggestion to combine selected elements of the Ni, Wallace and Mukai references in a manner that results in a frame assembly wherein a vertically extending rear attachment of a subframe is attached to a downwardly sloping intermediate section of a frame rail, as called for in claim 12, is found in the luxury of hindsight accorded one who first viewed appellants’ disclosure. This, of 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007