Ex parte MORRISON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2001-1018                                                        
          Application 09/211,688                                                      




          Claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 13 through 15, 18 and 19 stand                           
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by GB                
          ‘575.                                                                       


          Claims 1 through 4, 7 through 10, 13 through 15, 18 and                     
          19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                         
          anticipated by Van Solt.                                                    


          Claims 1 through 4, 7 through 10, 13 through 15, 18 and                     
          19 additionally stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                  
          being anticipated by GB ‘395.                                               


          Claims 1 through 5, 7 through 11 and 13 through 16 stand                    
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
          Schwartz in view of GB ‘395 or Van Solt.                                    


          Claims 1 through 4, 7 through 10, 13 through 15, 18 and                     
          19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable               
          over Van Solt, or GB ‘395, or GB ‘575.                                      


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007