Appeal No. 2001-1018 Application 09/211,688 system, we find nothing in GB ‘575 which corresponds to the self-service checkout terminal recited in claim 7 having a terminal memory device electrically coupled to a processing unit therein, with said terminal memory device having stored therein a plurality of instructions which, when executed by the processing unit, causes the processing unit of the self- service terminal to perform the functions (a) through (d) set forth in the last four clauses of claim 7. In contrast to the examiner’s position (answer, page 4) that “the checkout terminal cannot distinct [sic, distinguish] whether the customer or the cashier is going to re-enter the number of scanned items,” we note the terminal memory device of the self-service checkout terminal of claim 7 on appeal and the processing unit therein are specifically programmed to “operate said self-service checkout terminal so as to allow said customer to enter said number of items into said self- service checkout terminal in response to generation of said audit-required control signal.” Based on the foregoing, we conclude that GB ‘575 does not 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007