The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TAKASHI OYAMADA
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1266
Application No. 08/966,788
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before CALVERT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 6 to 25, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
1 The oral hearing scheduled for June 13, 2001 was vacated
(Paper No. 30, faxed June 4, 2001). In view of this decision, a
hearing is not considered necessary. See 37 CFR § 1.194(c), last
sentence.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007