Appeal No. 2001-1266 Page 2
Application No. 08/966,788
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a casing structure
of communication equipment used for a wireless communications
base station (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims
under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's
brief.
Claims 6 to 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101
because the claimed invention is not supported by either a
scientific asserted utility or a well established utility.
Claims 6 to 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, as containing subject matter which was not described in
the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art
to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to
make and/or use the invention.
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced
by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted
rejections, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 23,
mailed October 2, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007