The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DONALD A. CAMPBELL
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1404
Application No. 09/145,399
____________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 27, 2001
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1, 2, 4, 6 through 8, 13
through 15, 19, 20, and 25. Claims 3, 5, 9 through 12, 17,1
18, and 22 through 24 stand allowed. Claim 16 stands objected
to because of it dependency from a rejected claim but is
1To correct an omission regarding claim 8 in the Office
action dated June 9, 2000 (Paper No. 12) from which the appeal
was taken, the examiner sent a further Office action dated
November 3, 2000 (Paper No. 16), responded to by appellant in
the “SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICANT’S APPEAL BRIEF” (Paper No. 17).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007