Appeal No. 2001-1404
Application No. 09/145,399
Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.
Claims 1, 8, 13, 14, and 25 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Gilchrist in view
of PAXAR 8500 and Parker.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gilchrist in view of PAXAR 8500.
Claims 4, 7, 19, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Gilchrist in view of
PAXAR 8500 and Coast.
Claims 2 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Gilchrist in view of PAXAR 8500 and
Parker, as applied to claims 1 and 13, further in view of
Coast.
The full text of the examiner’s rejections and response
to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007