Ex parte KING - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2001-1637                                                        
          Application No. 08/800,052                                                  

               Claims 1, 8, 9, 15 and 18 through 20 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Myslinski in                  
          view of Dahme.                                                              
               Claims 5, 6, 10, 14, 22, 23 and 25 through 27 stand                    
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                
          Myslinski in view of Dahme and Boutin.                                      
               Claims 7 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                
          as being unpatentable over Myslinski in view of Dahme, Boutin               
          and Lyman.                                                                  
               Claims 16 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)               
          as being unpatentable over Myslinski in view of Dahme and                   
          Jentzen.                                                                    


               Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over Myslinski in view of Dahme, Boutin and              
          Andresen.                                                                   
               Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over Myslinski in view of Dahme, Boutin,                 
          Lyman and Fischer.                                                          





                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007