Appeal No. 2001-1637
Application No. 08/800,052
Claims 10, 14 and 22 through 27 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Myslinski in view
of Boutin.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Myslinski in view of Boutin and
Andresen.
Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Myslinski in view of Boutin and Lyman.
Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Myslinski in view of Boutin, Lyman and
Fischer.
Attention is directed to the appellant’s brief (Paper No.
21) and to the examiner’s final rejection and answer (Paper
Nos. 17 and 24) for the respective positions of the appellant
and the examiner with regard to the merits of these
rejections.
DISCUSSION
Myslinski, the examiner’s primary reference, discloses a
knockdown stereo cabinet 40 which includes “bottom 50, top 52,
left 54, right 56 and back 58 panels, shelves 60, a glass door
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007