Ex Parte FERNANDES et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      


                                                            Paper No. 20              


                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                         Ex parte ANTONIO CARLOS FERNANDES,                           
                        MAURICIO DA JUSTA ALBANO DE ARATANHA                          
                                         and                                          
                         SYLVIO HENRIQUE SA CORREA DA SILVA                           
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2001-1702                                  
                               Application 09/186,429                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                              HEARD:  OCTOBER 23, 2001                                
                                   _______________                                    

          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and McQUADE,  Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's                  
          refusal to allow claims 1, 3, 4, 6 through 10 and 12 through 19             
          as amended subsequent to the final rejection in papers filed                
          on June 29, 2000 (Paper No. 8) and September 21, 2000 (Paper                
          No. 12).  Claims 1, 3, 4, 6 through 10 and 12 through 19 are all            


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007