The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID ROMAN GORE ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1886 Application No. 09/166,713 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claim 22. Claims 11-13, 18, 23, 24, 28 and 29 have been allowed, and claims 5, 25 and 27 have been objected to. The remaining claims have been cancelled. WE REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007