Ex parte GORE - Page 4




              Appeal No. 2001-1886                                                                 Page 4                 
              Application No. 09/166,713                                                                                  


              areas of commonality with the claimed structure, it is not a toilet and it does not include an              
              apparatus for flushing water from a tank to a toilet.  Nor does it disclose a solid detergent,              
              as is required by the claim, but a “chemical treating agent” for a boiler or the like, which is             
              not explicitly described as a detergent, nor is there any reason to conclude that it would                  
              inherently be or function as a detergent.  Finally, claim 22 requires that the water supply                 
              means deliver water to the vessel in which the detergent solution is contained “during a                    
              portion of the time water is flowing into the tank” and, from our perspective, there is no                  
              teaching in Ellis upon which to base a conclusion that such is the case.                                    
                     For the aforesaid reasons, it is our conclusion that Ellis does not disclose or teach                
              all of the subject matter recited in claim 22, and therefore does not anticipate the                        
              claim.                                                                                                      














                                                       SUMMARY                                                            









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007