Appeal No. 2001-1898 Application No. 08/835,945 modification obvious unless the desirability thereof was suggested by the prior art. In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783-84 (Fed. Cir. 1992). Rejection Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), claims 57 and 59 to 62 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Stenberg in view of the Snap-on Catalog. Stenberg is discussed above in relation to rejection (4). The Snap-on Catalog at page 233 discloses, as item Q, a file handle which is cylindrical, with a l" diameter. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill, in view of the Snap-on Catalog, to use a cylindrical shape for the file handle 2 of Stenberg, the Catalog suggesting that such a handle is desirable because it "[p]rovides a large, comfortable grip for all bastard cut files." With a cylindrical handle, the ends of the bar 6 of Stenberg would be made cylindrical so that they would "join" (conform to) the surface of the handle and not injure the user's hand, as disclosed at page 3, last two lines. Conclusion The examiner's decision to reject claims 55 and 56 under § 112, second paragraph, is affirmed; to reject claims 47 to 56 under § 102(b) is affirmed as to claims 47, 49, 52, 54 and 55, 12Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007