Ex Parte GALLOWAY - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2001-2236                                                        
          Application 07/955,669                                                      

          single bit of the SCSI data bus is asserted to indicate the                 
          initiator device selecting itself as a target; and if any single            
          bit of the SCSI data bus is asserted, the separate target device            
          responding on the SCSI bus" (emphasis added) because Coulson                
          requires that the target device determines whether a specific bit           
          corresponding to the initiator device is asserted.                          
                                         (1)                                          
               As to limitation (1), the Examiner finds that Coulson                  
          teaches "the separate target device not being assigned a SCSI               
          address (abstract)" (EA4) and that "Coulson [c]learly teaches the           
          addressless target selection (e.g.[,] col. 2, lines 46-68 and               
          col. 8, lines 18-64[)], Coulson accomplishes the targetless [sic,           
          addressless] selection by sharing ID or bit number and by using             
          self selection and sharing the address of a device with ID with a           
          device that doesn't have an ID, adding [to] the number of devices           
          connected to the SCSI [bus] (see col. 2, lines 64-68)" (EA6-7).             
          The Examiner's real position appears to be as follows (EA7):                
          "Examiner asserts that Coulson does not assign an address to the            
          additional device connected to the SCSI [bus], the additional               
          device merely asserts the address of the device that has an                 
          address assigned to [it] (see col. 8, lines 24-63).  Examiner               
          concludes that [] merely sharing an address does not equate to              
          assigning an address to the additional device."                             


                                        - 4 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007