Appeal No. 2001-2236 Application 07/955,669 The cited portions of Coulson do not teach addressless target selection. The abstract discusses "the sharing of a SCSI address ID between a SCSI initiator and a target device," which teaches that the target device has an address, albeit one that is the same as the SCSI initiator. Column 2, lines 46-68, and column 8, lines 18-64, discuss address sharing, meaning that the target has an address which is the same as the initiator. Nothing in Coulson discusses an addressless target device. We do not agree with the Examiner's position that address sharing is not the same thing as assigning an address to the additional device. Coulson expressly discloses that "address sharing" means giving the target device an ID address which is the same as the SCSI initiator. There are many references to the target having a an ID address (which is not unique), such as: (1) col. 8, lines 26-29 ("The initiator . . . asserts the ID address of the target device, which in this case is the same as the host adapter ID address."); (2) col. 8, lines 38-39 ("The target . . . has no unique ID address . . . ."); (3) col. 8, lines 44-45 ("Because it has the same ID address as the initiator, the target . . . ."); and (4) Fig. 3 showing host adapter 14 and controller 16D with the same address "ID #7." Coulson expressly discloses that the separate target device is assigned a SCSI address and, therefore, does not anticipate the limitation of "the separate target device not being assigned a - 5 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007