Ex Parte BOETTCHER et al - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 2002-0089                                                                                                               
                 Application No. 09/331,647                                                                                                         

                 example, as skin-care and body-care formulations.   (Wahle, col. 6, lines 27-32).                                                  
                                                                                                                                                   
                          Wahle’s dispersion is formed with: (A) 10 to 80% of a wax; (B) 0.5 to 30% by weight of                                    
                 a nonionic dispersant; and (c) 1 to 30% by weight of a hydrophobic co-dispersant selected from                                     
                 the group of fatty alcohols or partial esters of polyols containing 3 to 6 carbon atoms with fatty                                 
                 acids.  (Wahle, col. 2, lines 8-17).  Oils may be present in addition to the waxes (A), such those                                 
                 conforming to the formula R1-COOR2 wherein R1 and R2 denote alkyl groups.  (Wahle, col. 2,                                         
                 line 64 to col. 14).  Other suitable oils include fatty acid triglycerides.  (Wahle, col. 2, lines 43-                             
                 58).  A preferred nonionic dispersant (B) is a fatty alcohol polyglycol ether.  (Wahle, col. 2, lines                              
                 30-39).  Additionally, another dispersant (B) that may be included is a fatty acid partial glyceride.                              
                 (Wahle, col. 4, lines 40-60).                                                                                                      


                 3.       The Rejections                                                                                                            
                          (1)     Claims 15-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph as lacking                                     
                 enablement.                                                                                                                        
                          (2)     Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as indefinite.                                   
                          (3)     Claims 8-12 and 14-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                                   
                 Schambil.                                                                                                                          
                          (4)     Claims 8-12 and 14-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by                                   
                 Wahle.                                                                                                                             

                                                                         5                                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007