The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 121
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
ALAIN LAGRANGE, BERNADETTE LUPPI, AND ALEX JUNINO
Junior Party1,
v.
GUENTHER KONRAD, IDUNA MATZIK, AND EDGAR LIESKE
Senior Party2
___________
Patent Interference No. 103,548
___________
FINAL HEARING: April 28, 1999
___________
Before SCHAFER, GRON and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 Application 07/707,130, filed May 31, 1991, now U.S. Patent 5,178,637, granted 1/12/93. Accorded the
benefit of France application 9006803, filed May 31, 1990, with respect to Counts 1 and 2 only, see infra.
Also, application 08/676,491 for reissue of U.S. Patent 5,178,637, filed July 8, 1996. Accorded the benefit
of France application 9006803, filed May 31, 1990, with respect to all counts. Assigned to L’Oreal of
Paris, France.
2 Application 07/949,851, filed November 19, 1992. Accorded the benefit of PCT application PCT/EP
91/00874, filed May 10, 1991, and German application P4016177.3, filed May 19, 1990, with respect to all
the counts. Assigned to Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien of Duesseldorf, Germany.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007