Patent Interference No. 103,548
water/solvent medium using only 5 different solvents (claim 30 specifies 13
solvents) at about 10 percent of the medium being solvent (claim 30 includes
from 1 ppm solvent to over 99% solvent)?" [KI7]
· "Whether the results in Mr. Cotteret's Declaration II actually establish
unexpected superior results for Lagrange's reissue claim 30?" [KI8]
· "Whether Lagrange's reissue claim 31, which is almost identical to
Lagrange's original claim 5 which was designated as corresponding to Count
2, is obvious from Lagrange's claims 1, 4, 5 and 30 and/or Konrad's claims 4-
7 and therefore defines the same patentable invention as Count 2?" [KI9]
· "Whether Lagrange's reissue claim 32, which is identical to Lagrange's
original claim 24 except for dependencies, is obvious from Lagrange's claims
1, 4, 24 and 30 and/or Konrad's claims 4-7 and therefore defines the same
patentable invention as Count 2?" [KI10]
· "Whether reissue claim 33 of Lagrange, which is identical to Lagrange's
original claim 25 except for dependencies, is obvious from Lagrange's claims
1, 4, 25 and 30 and/or Konrad's claims 4-7 and therefore defines the same
patentable invention as Count 2?" [KI11]
· "Whether Lagrange's reissue claim 34 is broader and defines the same
invention as Lagrange's original claim 9 which have been designated as
corresponding to Count 3?" [KI12]
· "Whether Lagrange's reissue claim 34 would be obvious over
Lagrange's claim 9-21 and/or Konrad's claim 13 in view of Grollier '500,
French '061, U.S. Patent 4,992,077, U.S. Patent 4,004,877, DE 2,028,818
and/or U.S. Patent 5,053,053 and therefore define the same invention as
Count 3 of this interference?" [KI13]
· "Whether Lagrange's reissue claim 34 is broader in scope than
Lagrange's patent claim 9 and has been improperly broadened since the
reissue application was filed over two years after the issuance of the patent?"
[KI14]
Page: Previous 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007