THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. ___
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
PHILLIP H. RIGGINS and JOHN H. HANSEN,
Junior Party,
v.
JOHN R. HOLSTEN and NIGEL E. NEELY,
Senior Party.
____________
Interference 103,685
____________
Final Hearing: October 15, 2001
____________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
GRON, and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL DECISION
1. Background
September 28, 1990 - JOHN R. HOLSTEN and NIGEL E. NEELY
(hereafter Holsten) filed U.S. Application 07/589,919, entitled
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007