RIGGINS et al v. HOLSTEN et al - Page 7



          Interference 103,685                                                          
                    the fabric of claim 9 of the Holsten et al. patent,                 
                                          or                                            
                    the method of claim 10 of the Holsten et al. patent,                
                                          or                                            
                    the fabric of claim 14 of the Holsten et al. patent,                
                                          or                                            
                    the method of claim 15 of the Holsten et al. patent,                
                                          or                                            
                    the method of claim 21 of the Holsten et al. patent,                
                                          or                                            
                    the fibrous material of claim 25 of the Holsten et al.              
               patent,                                                                  
                                          or                                            
                    the fabric of claim 29 of the Holsten et al. patent,                
                                          or                                            
                    the fiber of claim 30 of the Holsten et al. patent,                 
                                          or                                            
                    the fabric of claim 34 of the Holsten et al. patent,                
                                          or                                            
                    the method of claim 35 of the Holsten et al. patent.                
               Junior party Riggins’ claims which were designated as                    
          corresponding to the Count 1 at the time the interference was                 
          declared and are deemed to be representative of Riggins’ claimed              

                                          -7-                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007