The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 55 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ DAVID R. PACHOLOK Junior Party, 1 HENRY H. HUTMACHER, JOHN E. WILL, JAMES YOUNGMAN, PHILLIP D. LANE and MICHAEL V. BELL Senior Party. 2 ________________ Interference No. 103,830 ________________ FINAL HEARING: December 13, 2000 ________________ Before URYNOWICZ, MARTIN and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge. FINAL DECISION The invention at issue in this interference relates to an apparatus and method for disabling a vehicle. The particular subject matter in issue is illustrated by counts 1 and 2 as follows: Count 1 A vehicle disabling device capable of contacting a pursued vehicle, sending an electrical discharge therethrough, and disabling at least one electric system of a vehicle; the vehicle 1 Application No. 08/367,581, filed January 3, 1995, now U.S. Patent No. 5,503,059, issued April 2, 1996. 2 Application No. 08/273,560, filed July 11, 1994. Assignors to Jaycor.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007