Interference No. 104,190 The junior party has raised the following issues for final decision: a) the junior party’s deferred motion under 37 CFR § 1.634 to add Mark A. Rydell as a joint inventor to the junior party’s involved patent; b) the junior party’s priority case, particularly the junior party’s alleged reduction to practice in December 1991; c) the senior party’s priority case, specifically the senior party’s alleged conception and reduction to practice of the subject matter of the count, and the alleged lack of diligence on the part of the senior party. The senior party has raised the following issues in the senior party brief at final hearing: a) the construction of the language in the count; b) the junior party’s alleged reduction to practice by non- inventor Rydell, specifically whether the subject matter allegedly reduced to practice was within the scope of the count and was successfully tested; c) alleged abandonment, suppression or concealment on the part of the junior party; 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007