The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 21 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ JURGEN ROHRMANN, Junior Party, (Patent 5,391,789), v. HELMUT G. ALT, SYRIAC J. PALACKAL, KONSTANTINOS PATSIDIS, M. BRUCE WELCH, ROLF. L. GEERTS, ERIC T. HSIEH, MAX P. McDANIEL, GIL R. HAWLEY and PAUL D. SMITH, Senior Party (Application 09/197,761). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,626 (McK) _______________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. FINAL DECISION A. Introduction As the record makes clear, Rohrmann has conceded on the issue of priority with respect to Count 2, the only count in the Interference (Paper 18, page 2). The only issue remaining forPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007