6. The claims of the parties which correspond to
Count 2, and therefore are involved in the interference
(35 U.S.C. § 135(a)), are:
Rohrmann: 6 and 9-18
Alt '761: 42, 46, 48 and 90-101
7. The claims of the parties which do not
correspond to Count 2, and therefore are not involved in the
interference, are:
Rohrmann: 1-5 and 7-8
Alt '761: 49, 51-53 and 78-83
8. Rohrmann claim 6, mentioned in Count 2, relates to
a method of polymerizing an olefin using a metallocene.
9. Alt claims 78 and 96, mentioned in Count 2, also
relate to method of polymerizing an olefin using a metallocene.
10. Alt claim 90, mentioned in Count 2, relates to a
method of polymerizing ethylene (ethylene is an olefin).
11. Rohrmann claim 5, not mentioned in Count 2,
relates to a method of making a metallocene; Rohrmann claim 5
does not relate to a method of polymerizing an olefin.
12. We will assume that the product produced by the
method of Rohrmann claim 5 can be used in the processes defined
by each of Rohrmann claim 6 and Alt claims 78, 90 and 96.
13. As noted earlier, Alt has filed a preliminary
motion seeking to have Rohrmann claim 5 designated as
corresponding to Count 2. 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(3).
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007