The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HUNG YA CHAO ____________ Appeal No. 1996-1942 Application No. 07/977,834 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WARREN, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow claims 1 through 26, which are all the claims on appeal in this application. Claims 27 and 28 stand withdrawn from consideration as directed to a non- elected invention. 37 CFR § 1.142(b). See the Final Rejection mailed May 13, 1994. In addition an amendment under 37 CFR § 1.116 received on April 13, 1995, amending claim 15, was not entered by the examiner. See the letter mailed May 8,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007