Ex parte RITZ - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1996-3541                                                                                        
              Application 08/275,307                                                                                      



                     1.  In a microcontroller of the type which includes an execution unit for executing                  
              stored program instructions, a memory system for storing said program instructions and                      
              comprising:                                                                                                 
                     memory means for storing said program instructions, said memory means including                      
              a static random access memory; and                                                                          
                     program interface means coupled to said static random access memory and                              
              arranged to be coupled to an external source of said program instructions for providing                     
              said static random access memory with said program instructions from said external                          
              source of said program instructions for use by said microcontroller to control a device as a                
              device driver.                                                                                              
                     The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                              
              Goodman et al. (Goodman)                   4,099,236            July 4, 1978                                
              Andersen et al. (Andersen)          4,718,003            Jan. 5, 1988                                       
                     Claims 30 through 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated                    

              by Goodman.  All claims on appeal, claims 1 through 21 and 23 through 35, stand rejected                    
              under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Andersen                       
              alone.  The supplemental examiner's answer issued in response to the earlier-noted                          
              remand order from this panel does not affirmatively state that the other rejections of record               
              from the final rejection have been formally withdrawn.   Since they have not been                           
              repeated in the latest answer, we consider them to have been withdrawn by the examiner                      
              in response to the remand order.  Appellant's most recent reply brief in response to this                   
              latest answer implicitly agrees.                                                                            



                                                            2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007