Appeal No. 1996-3619 Application No. 08/397,021 oscillating means for receiving said reference signal, and generating said clock signal at an oscillation frequency in response to a first value of said reference signal, and refraining from oscillating in response to a second value of said reference signal; and control means for receiving said reference signal and said clock signal, and generating therefrom an adjusting signal for adjusting said oscillation frequency so that the difference between the adjusted oscillation frequency and a predetermined desired frequency does not exceed a predetermined value. The Examiner relies on the following prior art: Kraus et al. (Kraus) 4,672,449 Jun. 09, 1987 Hirao et al. (Hirao) 4,996,596 Feb. 26, 1991 (filed Sep. 01, 1989) Claims 1, 2, 5, 9, 19, and 21 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kraus. Claims 4, 11, and 22 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kraus in view of Hirao. Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 35) and Answer (Paper No. 36) for the respective details thereof. OPINION We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections advanced by the Examiner and the 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007