Ex parte OUDEN - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-3619                                                        
          Application No. 08/397,021                                                  


                    oscillating means for receiving said reference                    
               signal, and generating said clock signal at an                         
               oscillation frequency in response to a first value of                  
               said reference signal, and refraining from oscillating in              
               response to a second value of said reference signal; and               
                    control means for receiving said reference signal                 
               and said clock signal, and generating therefrom an                     
               adjusting signal for adjusting said oscillation frequency              
               so that the difference between the adjusted oscillation                
               frequency and a predetermined desired frequency does not               
               exceed a predetermined value.                                          
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Kraus et al. (Kraus)          4,672,449                Jun. 09,             
                                                                 1987                 
          Hirao et al. (Hirao)          4,996,596                Feb. 26,             
                                                                 1991                 
                                                  (filed Sep. 01, 1989)               
               Claims 1, 2, 5, 9, 19, and 21 stand finally rejected                   
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kraus.                     
          Claims 4, 11, and 22 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. §               
          103 as being unpatentable over Kraus in view of Hirao.                      
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the               
          Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 35) and                 
          Answer (Paper No. 36) for the respective details thereof.                   
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered the subject matter on                     
          appeal, the rejections advanced by the Examiner and the                     

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007