Appeal No. 1996-3706
Application 07/854,921
include a user selected format of the second presentation.
Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claim 17
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Conrad.
As regards claims 18-22, we note that Appellant has
indicated on page 6, section VII, of the brief that claims 18-
22 are grouped together. We further note that Appellant has
argued all the claims in this group together and based upon 24
the same arguments. In accordance with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7),25
it will be presumed that the rejected claims stand or fall
together unless there is a statement otherwise, and in the
appropriate part or parts of the arguments Appellant presents
specific reasons as to why Appellant considers the rejected
claims to be separately
patentable. We will, thereby, consider claims 18-22 as
standing or falling together.
In regard to claims 18-22, Appellant asserts that
while Conrad uses combinations of colors, using colors to
24Brief, page 11
25Brief, pages 10 and 11
16
Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007