Ex parte CALABRESI et al. - Page 5




              Appeal No. 1996-3866                                                                                     
              Application 08/087,957                                                                                   


              Adherence to this model would result in a more coherent, understandable statement of the                 
              rejection.                                                                                               
                     In any event, the claimed method requires that the 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine and                 
              methotrexate be administered within a 48 hour time period.  The examiner has not                         
              provided evidence of, and we do not find, any disclosure in Minor which would suggest                    
              administration of 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine and  methotrexate within a 48 hour time                     
              period.                                                                                                  
                     Minor describes administration of methotrexate as part of a chemotherapy regimen                  
              for treatment of kaposi's sarcoma in AIDS patients on day 22 and sometime “after                         
              chemotherapy was stopped” four patients “were begun on zidovudine”.   Minor, abstract.                   
              The abstract is ambiguous as to when AZT treatment was begun.  It is mere speculation on                 
              the part of the examiner that the AZT treatment of chemotherapy patients commenced on                    
              day 24, one day after the chemotherapy regimen stopped on day 23, and at least two days                  
              after treatment with methotrexate on day 22.                                                             
                     Conclusions of obviousness must be based upon facts not generalities.   See In re                 
              Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 178 (CCPA 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S.                       
              1057 (1968);  In re Freed, 425 F.2d 785, 165 USPQ 570, 571 (CCPA 1970).    In the                        
              present case the examiner has provided no conclusive fact or evidence that the                           




                                                          5                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007