Ex parte GROSSMAN et al. - Page 14




          Appeal No. 1996-4148                                                        
          Application No. 08/327,085                                                  
          prior art reference or shown to be common knowledge of                      
          unquestionable demonstration.  Our reviewing court requires                 
          this                                                                        
          evidence in order to establish a prima facie case.  In re                   
          Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1471-72, 223 USPQ 785, 787-88 (Fed.                
          Cir. 1984); In re Knapp-Monarch Co., 296 F.2d 230, 232, 132                 
          USPQ 6, 8 (CCPA 1961); In re Cofer, 354 F.2d 664, 668, 148                  
          USPQ 268, 271-72 (CCPA 1966).  Furthermore, our reviewing                   
          court states in In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 223 USPQ 785,                
          788 (Fed. Cir. 1984) the following:                                         
               The Supreme Court in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383                     
               U.S. 1 (1966), focused on the procedural and                           
               evidentiary processes in reaching a conclusion under                   
               Section 103.  As adapted to ex parte procedure,                        
               Graham is interpreted as continuing to place the                       
               "burden of proof on the Patent Office which requires                   
               it to produce the factual basis for its rejection of                   
               an application under section 102 and 103."  Citing                     
               In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1020, 154 USPQ 173, 177                   
               (CCPA 1967).                                                           
               Therefore, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-              
          20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kreitman                
          et al.                                                                      






                                          14                                          





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007