The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WINFRIED G. PAUL,
SIVARAM KRISHNAN,
and
ROGER J. WHITE
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1063
Application No. 08/414,702
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 5 through 7 in the
above-identified application. Subsequent to the final Office
action dated Feb. 26, 1996 (Paper No. 7), claim 8 was canceled
and newly
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007