Appeal No. 1997-1063
Application No. 08/414,702
In support of his rejection, the examiner relies on the
following prior art references:
Paul et al. (Paul) 4,600,632 Jul. 15,
1986
Mark 4,220,583 Sep. 2,
1980
Claims 5 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Mark and
Paul.
We reverse.
This is the second appeal of claimed subject matter
directed to a thermoplastic molding composition. In
comparison with the claims previously considered by the Board
in the decision entered March 8, 1995, in related Application
07/755,916, Appeal No. 1993-3828 (Paper No. 13), the presently
claimed thermoplastic molding composition requires, inter
alia, a partially fluorinated polyolefin having a higher
number average molecular weight than that claimed previously
and precludes certain components included in the previously
considered composition. Specifically, the presently claimed
thermoplastic molding composition consists essentially of a
homogeneous blend of a block copolycarbonate selected from
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007